Does your team re-open decisions you already made?
I’m validating a problem before building anything.
Founder-led teams (roughly 3–15 people) keep re-debating the same strategic calls — pricing, policy, positioning — because the reasoning never got written down in one findable place. The founder becomes the oracle. Same meeting, same tradeoffs, different week.
I’m not selling software yet. I’m testing whether this pain is real enough that teams would use a simple founder decision log (context, options ruled out, outcome, review date).
Two asks:
- Join the early access list if this sounds familiar: https://recordthewhy.com
- Book a 15-minute validation call — I’ll ask about the last decision your team re-litigated. No feature pitch.
If you’ve re-explained a decision more than twice in 90 days, I’d love to hear how you handle it today (Notion doc, ADR tool, nothing, oral history tour…).
What broke for you — and what would “good enough” look like?